Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Addicted!


            It seems like all we do nowadays has to do something with technology. One way or another we’re seeking – twitter, texts, Google, and over course, Facebook. One way or another, information seeking is all the rag, the new trend. It’s the in thing. Both of my articles I have chosen talk, about this. Seeking information behavior, if you will. “Seeking” by Emily Yolfe was found in our book; Bedford Guide, but “ Why we’re all addicted to text, twitter and Google” by Susan Weinschenk was found online, what a shocker, right? Although both of my authors are similar, from my perspective, I side more with Susan’s article; simply because she seems more educated on the subject, making the reader actually understand what’s she’s talking about.
            Now, when it comes to dopamine levels, both of these authors know their fair share of information. Emily explains, “Dopamine circuits promote states of eagerness and directed purpose.” (573) This is something I slightly agree with, I think that dopamine doesn’t really circuit eagerness any more than it circuits directed purpose. I don’t think it can only circuit two emotions. Susan argues that “Dopamine is created in various parts of the brain and is critical in all sorts of brain functions, including thinking, moving, sleeping, mood, attention, motivation, seeking and reward.” Now this is something that I agree with, dopamine controls a lot more than just two emotions, according to Susan. I think Susan has a little more knowledge on this information, she explains this in a way that I actually understand.
            Another good topic both of my authors argue against is the subject of lab rats and human beings. Emily briefly goes over how rats are conducted in a lab study and were used for shocks of electrons to their brain. “We actually resemble nothing so much as those legendary lab rats that newly pressed a lever to gave themselves a little electric jolt to the brain.” (572) While Susan explains things in a much more clear, and understandable way: “Research on rats shows that if you destroy dopamine neurons, rats can walk, chew, and swallow, but will starve to death even when food is right next to them.” I think this helps the reader understand what Susan is talking about. In this concept of the dopamine levels, from reading both articles thoroughly, my personal opinion is that Susan knows just a little bit more about the subject.
            The last thing that both of my authors talk about in the articles, are how we are never satisfied with the information we have now. Seeing how everything is at our fingertips, it seems as if the information seeking is endless. Emily states: “An article by Nicholas Carr in the Atlantic last year, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” speculates that our constant Internet scrolling is remodeling our brains to make it nearly impossible for us to give sustained attention to a long piece of writing. Like lab rats we keep hitting “enter” to get our next fix.” (573) I feel like this is the only good piece of advice that Emily wrote in her article. Susan argues that, “…dopamine system is most powerfully stimulated when the information coming in is small so that it doesn’t fully satisfy. A short text or twitter (can only be 140 characters!) is ideally suited to send your dopamine system raging.” When I read this from Susan article I understood this more than from Emily’s article. Simply because nowadays everything is either 130-140 words or less.
            Both of these authors give very compelling arguments about information seeking, both of which have got me to think a little bit more on how I conduct my own information seeking. The big picture is, I think, although Emily makes a valid point here and there while writing her article; Susan has a little more information on this subject. I do feel that Susan talks more about what we can actually do to stop the seeking. Turning off all electronics, that’s a very good conclusion but not realistic. Everything is electronic today; turning off (unplugging ourselves) from technology isn’t something that we can actually do.


Worked Cited

Yolfe, Emily. "Seeking." Bedford Guide. Print

Weinschenk, Dr. Susan. "Why Were All Addicted to Text, Twitter, and Google." Web. <http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brain-wise/201209/why-were-all-addicted-texts-twitter-and-google>.